The World Rugby Rankings: A Fan's Guide

World Rugby Rankings: A Fan's Guide

The World Rugby Rankings are a constant talking point for rugby fans and pundits alike. Since their introduction, these rankings have served as the ultimate benchmark for international rugby success. They reveal who’s dominating, who’s struggling, and who’s punching above their weight on the global stage. But how exactly do these rankings work? What determines who climbs to the top or falls down the table? In this blog, we’ll break down the system, why it matters, how it shapes the game we love, and address some of the common criticisms.

[prc-collections-carousel]

Understanding the Points Exchange System

When the World Rugby Rankings were introduced for Men in 2003 and Women in 2007, each team was provided with an initial points ranking between 0 and 100 based on historical results. Since then the rankings have been determined by a points exchange system after each international match i.e what one team gains in points the other loses. Teams don't simply accumulate points; they 'win' them from their opponents. This dynamic system ensures the rankings reflect current form.

Factors Affecting the Points Exchange

Four key factors determine how many points change hands after a match:

  • Match Result: This is the most obvious factor. Winning earns you points, losing costs you points. A draw favours the lower-ranked team.
  • Magnitude of Victory: A narrow win is good, but a dominant victory is even better. A winning margin of 15 points or more significantly increases the points exchange (approximately 1.5 times the standard exchange).
  • Strength of the Opposition: Beating a higher-ranked team is more valuable than beating a lower-ranked team. If the top-ranked team beats the 10th-ranked team, the points exchange will be smaller than if the 10th-ranked team upsets the top team. This reflects the difficulty of achieving such an upset. While the exact calculations are complex, the bigger the difference in rankings, the greater the potential points swing for the lower-ranked team, and the smaller the gain for the higher-ranked team (if they win).
  • Home Advantage: Playing at home provides a slight advantage. Beating a team on their home turf earns you slightly more points than beating them at a neutral venue. While the exact impact is small, it can be crucial in close matches.

The exact amount of points exchanged is determined by an algorithm considering all four of these factors. There is a maximum amount of points that can be exchanged, ensuring upsets don't cause the system to overreact. Similarily if teams are significantly mismatched a win by the higher ranked team can see no change in points. Points exchanged in Rugby World Cup matches are doubled, reflecting the heightened importance and competition of these events.

Real-World Examples

An example of the rankings in action was seen during the recent Men's Autumn Internationals. In week two, ninth-ranked Australia (79.32 points) beat fifth-ranked England (84.43 points) 42-37 in London. This upset saw 1.82 points exchanged. England hence fell to seventh, while Australia rose to eighth. On the same weekend, fourth-ranked France beat fourteenth-ranked Japan 52-12 in Paris. Despite the much larger scoreline, this result saw no points exchanged and no change in ranking for either team, given the relative disparity in the teams and the French home advantage.

What the Rankings Mean

The World Rugby Rankings create talking points and fuel debates among fans, adding another layer of excitement to international rugby. They allow teams to track progress over time and indicate how teams compare. The rankings also determine which teams are grouped together in major competitions like the Rugby World Cup.

Criticisms of the Rankings

While the World Rugby Rankings strive to reflect the global rugby landscape, it's important to acknowledge some of its inherent challenges. One common criticism is that the system doesn't fully differentiate between wins and dominant performances beyond a 15-point threshold. Another point is that Tier 2 nations, such as Samoa or Portugal, who often face limited opportunities to compete against top-tier sides, potentially have their ability to climb the rankings impacted. Finally, the rankings can sometimes be sensitive to short-term results, leading to fluctuations that may not always reflect the bigger picture of a team's development.

So, there you have it! A breakdown of the World Rugby Rankings, how they work, and why they matter. While the system isn't perfect, it provides a fascinating lens through which to view the international game. What do you think? Where do you see your team heading? Let the debates begin in the comments below! And don't forget to gear up for the next big match at Rugbystuff.com!


Luke Oliver
Bio Hailing from New Zealand, Luke is passionate about all things rugby. Like all Kiwis, he first started playing at the age of 5 and continued into his 20’s. Originally an optometrist by trade, he packed up the 9-5 to travel South East Asia and Europe, before landing in Edinburgh. When not in store, Luke enjoys going for a run, travelling and supporting his beloved All Blacks!

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.